Abstract
This thesis explores why ethnicity was introduced as the basis for the reconstitution
of the Ethiopian state in 1991, examining the politicisation of ethnic identity before
and after the federation of the country’s ‘nations, nationalities and peoples’ was
instituted. The establishment of the modern Ethiopian empire state in the nineteenth
century, and the processes of centralisation and bureaucratisation which consolidated
it in the mid twentieth, provide a backdrop to an emerging concern with
‘regionalism’ amongst political circles in the 1960s and 1970s. Ethnicity operated as
both resource and product of the mobilisation by which the major movements of
armed opposition to the military regime of the 1970s and 1980s, later the architects
of ethnic federalism, sought control of the state. Under federalism through the 1990s,
political representation and territorial administration were reorganised in terms of
ethnicity. A stratum of the local elite of each ethnic group was encouraged to form an
ethnic organisation as a platform for executive office. Meanwhile ethnic groups and
their elites responded to these new circumstances in unanticipated but calculative
ways, often radically reviewing and reconstructing not only their sense of collective
interest, but also the very ethnic collectives that would best serve those newlyperceived
interests.
The architects of ethnic federalism are influenced by a Marxist formulation of the
‘National Question’ which incorporates contradictory elements inherent in the notion
of ‘granting self-determination’: the conviction that self-selected communities
respond better to mobilisation ‘from within’, in their own language, by their own
people; and the notion that ethnic groups are susceptible to identification, definition,
and prescription ‘from above’, by a vanguard party applying a checklist of externally
verifiable criteria. These two sets of assumptions correlate with tenets of
instrumentalism and primordialism respectively, which are, as they stand, equally
irreconcilable.
An investigation of theoretical approaches to ethnicity and collective action suggests
that many conflate the ‘real world’ and ‘socially constructed’ referents of the ethnic
profile of an individual (the constituents of the individual state of being an ethnic x),
with the fully constructed collective accomplishment which creates members of an
ethnic group (conferring the social status of being an ethnic x, of which those
referents are markers). Differentiating the two, and exploring the recursive
relationship between them, by means of a consideration of calculative action within
the framework of actors’ categories (emerging from emic knowledge systems) and
shared social institutions (premised, whether their referents are ‘natural’ ‘social’ or
‘artificial’, on collective processes of ‘knowledge construction’), may improve
analysis of the causes and operation of collective action associated with ethnicity and
ethno-nationalism.
Ethnic federalism in Ethiopia offered the prospect of a shift away from the ‘high
modernism’ of that state’s past projects to ‘develop’ its people, apparently in favour
of the collective perspectives of groups of its citizens. The coercive and
developmental imperatives of the state that guided its implementation, however, have
militated against the substantive incorporation of locally determined social
institutions and knowledge.
read more