We employ a two‐tier spatiotemporal analysis to investigate whether uranium operations
cause armed conflict in Africa. The macrolevel analysis suggests that – compared to the
baseline conflict risk – uranium ventures increase the risk of intrastate conflict by 10 percent.
However, we find ethnic exclusion to be a much better predictor of armed conflict
than uranium. The microlevel analysis reveals that uranium‐spurred conflicts are spatiotemporally
feasible in four countries: the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Namibia,
Niger and South Africa. We find strong evidence in the case of Niger, and partial evidence
in the case of the DRC. Namibia and South Africa do not yield substantial evidence of uranium‐
induced conflicts. We conclude that uranium may theoretically be a conflictinducing
resource, but to the present day empirical evidence has been sparse as most
countries are still in the exploration phase. Considering that the coming years will see 25
African countries transition from uranium explorers into producers, we strongly suggest
that our analysis be revisited in the coming years. Read more
No comments:
Post a Comment